{"id":"8bdcffb1-6f9e-43e9-b168-8d4f282c8bd7","workspace_slug":"orbital","window_days":7,"window_start":"2026-05-07T00:00:00Z","window_end":"2026-05-14T00:00:00Z","generated_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:39.238159Z","verdict_version":"phase8_v1","overall_posture":"watchful","summary":"This cycle centered on Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","top_priorities":["Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities"],"top_risks":["Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow."],"top_opportunities":["Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Check whether a commercial wedge sits underneath the apparently neutral update."],"recommended_next_actions":["Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Are there commercial interests behind the Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks narrative?","Who benefits if Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks gains mainstream acceptance?"],"monitor_only_items":["Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"linked_artifact_count":10,"linked_adjudication_count":1,"linked_proposal_count":0,"confidence_summary":{"confidence_score":33.8,"confidence_band":"low","ambiguity_score":0.0,"data_sparsity_score":0.0,"novelty_risk_score":100.0,"causal_weakness_score":0.0,"uncertainty_score":20.0,"uncertainty_band":"low","summary":"Confidence is low at 33.8/100; uncertainty is low at 20.0/100.","reasons":["Confidence is low because evidence sufficiency is 8.5/100 and corroboration is 0.0/100.","Uncertainty is low because ambiguity/data sparsity combine to 20.0/100."],"factors":[{"name":"evidence_sufficiency","value":8.5,"reason":"Confidence should track how much grounded evidence Orbital actually has."},{"name":"corroboration","value":0.0,"reason":"Independent reinforcement raises confidence."},{"name":"ambiguity","value":0.0,"reason":"Ambiguous or conflicting evidence should raise uncertainty."},{"name":"data_sparsity","value":0.0,"reason":"Thin data should keep confidence bounded."},{"name":"novelty_risk","value":100.0,"reason":"New patterns deserve more caution than recurring ones."},{"name":"causal_weakness","value":0.0,"reason":"Derived or correlative reads should carry extra uncertainty."}]},"audience_reasoning":{"reasoning_version":"phase7_v1","summary":"Audience reasoning lands hardest with Operator / CISO and Board; Operator / CISO is currently strongest, while Regulator remains the weakest fit. Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","most_relevant_audiences":["Operator / CISO","Board"],"highest_urgency_audiences":["Operator / CISO","Procurement"],"early_audiences":["Board","CEO / Founder","Procurement","Regulator","Operator / CISO"],"mature_audiences":[],"developing_audiences":[],"strongest_audience":"Operator / CISO","weakest_audience":"Regulator","audience_deltas":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","relevance_score":52.14,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":3.95,"confidence_score":32.54,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":1.6,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":12.79,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":39.57,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":46.64,"cares_most":true,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","relevance_score":46.36,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":-1.83,"confidence_score":31.03,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":0.09,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":8.94,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":34.0,"proof_burden":"medium","care_score":41.01,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"weak","reasons":[]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","relevance_score":50.71,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":2.52,"confidence_score":30.11,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":-0.83,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":8.87,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":40.29,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":46.26,"cares_most":true,"declared_signal_count":1,"evidence_signal_count":0,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"declared_audience_only","reasons":["This audience remains mostly declared-targeting language without stronger evidence carry-through."]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","relevance_score":36.79,"relevance_label":"low","relevance_delta":-11.4,"confidence_score":27.75,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":-3.19,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":5.16,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":35.0,"proof_burden":"very_high","care_score":36.03,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"weak","reasons":[]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","relevance_score":54.93,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":6.74,"confidence_score":33.25,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":2.31,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":12.51,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":40.86,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":48.79,"cares_most":true,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":2,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 2 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]}],"strongest_interventions_by_audience":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"]}],"learned_intervention_patterns":["Learning posture is drag: 0 confirming outcome(s), 0 falsifying outcome(s), 0 traction signal(s), and governance history 0/0/0 accepted/rejected/revised."]},"retrospective":{"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1","summary":"Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`. Confidence moved flat: 35.8 -> 33.8; uncertainty 20.0 -> 20.0. Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s). Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_we_thought":["Prior call: This cycle centered on Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low."],"what_happened":["This cycle: This cycle centered on Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","Decisive evidence: Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 8.5/100 and Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture...","Audience fit landed strongest with Operator / CISO and weakest with Regulator."],"what_changed":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`.","Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","The battlefield leader changed from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`."],"what_strengthened":[],"what_died":["Intervention weakened or died: Tighten posture around the governed weak points.","Intervention weakened or died: Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker.","Intervention weakened or died: Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors."],"what_we_learned":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`.","Confidence did not materially de-risk the call, so operator posture should stay bounded.","Intervention posture is reinforcing for 0 thread(s) and weakening for 4.","Audience fit is strongest for Operator / CISO and weakest for Regulator.","Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s)."],"watch_next":["Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"confidence_shift":{"direction":"flat","current_confidence_score":33.8,"prior_confidence_score":35.8,"current_uncertainty_score":20.0,"prior_uncertainty_score":20.0,"confidence_delta":-2.0,"uncertainty_delta":0.0,"summary":"Confidence moved flat: 35.8 -> 33.8; uncertainty 20.0 -> 20.0."},"battlefield_shift":{"direction":"leader_changed","current_leader":"Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","prior_leader":"Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","summary":"The battlefield leader changed from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`."},"intervention_posture":{"strengthened_intervention_count":0,"traction_intervention_count":0,"falsified_intervention_count":0,"stalled_intervention_count":4,"strongest_interventions":[],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"summary":"Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s)."},"retrospective_health_score":82.0},"strongest_evidence_summary":"Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 8.5/100 and Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture..","strongest_contradiction_summary":"This could still be a mixed signal where one visible lane is louder than the market as a whole.","governed_outcome_summary":"Civitas history for this workspace is low caution with revise rate 0% and hold rate 0%.","linked_artifact_refs":[{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"17f56d37-eb9e-46b6-8588-745dff4c46c4","title":"Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.553998+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":8.5}},{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"30298a19-ca98-40b7-995c-9cf27fac0997","title":"Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.553998+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":8.5}},{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"392d48f0-fb29-4c28-9d68-932eaac9ea7a","title":"Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.553998+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":12.9}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"message_push","artifact_id":"9c1789c6-7b2c-4068-b32e-17b214fdc12d","title":"Tighten posture around the governed weak points","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-05-12T06:15:24.989412+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Operator memo + leadership narrative","audience":"Executive sponsors and governance reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"pack_deployment","artifact_id":"8a579533-809f-43d0-ab55-677659a2ae60","title":"Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-05-12T06:15:24.989412+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Executive brief + proof pack","audience":"Procurement, legal, and risk reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"narrative_shift","artifact_id":"f99552cd-72fa-493a-963f-de27c26d2d56","title":"Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-05-12T06:15:24.989412+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Podcast brief + weekly post sequence","audience":"Executive sponsors and procurement stakeholders"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"message_push","artifact_id":"04617ef0-b93d-4653-9986-301af67025c1","title":"Tighten posture around the governed weak points","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-05-11T06:15:03.206423+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Operator memo + leadership narrative","audience":"Executive sponsors and governance reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"1138da5c-1bee-46a2-b5de-41ae5912258c","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly intervention rehearsal — Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker — 2026-05-12","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-05-11T06:15:26.736241+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"c40f0ecb-d352-41bb-b46a-687942b90f83","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly opportunity alignment scaffold — 2026-05-12","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-05-11T06:15:26.706539+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"8fea5d0f-7035-4d8d-90e6-6e3b03260298","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly risk pressure scaffold — 2026-05-12","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-05-11T06:15:26.662401+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}}],"linked_adjudications":[{"id":"f97f03ec-bd03-4b67-8a30-6ab604412296","handoff_bundle_id":"51c4580e-9fb9-4a20-966f-062fff494599","status":"heartbeat_succeeded","final_verdict":null,"publishable_as_is":false,"scope_status":null,"fallback_status":null,"fallback_reason":null,"manual_review_required":false,"coverage_fraction":null,"scope_within_capability":false,"submitted_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.116677Z","completed_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.297671Z","created_at":"2026-05-13T06:15:38.117144Z"}],"linked_proposals":[],"details":{"omega_version":"prompt_s4_v1","retrospective":{"summary":"Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`. Confidence moved flat: 35.8 -> 33.8; uncertainty 20.0 -> 20.0. Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s). Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_died":["Intervention weakened or died: Tighten posture around the governed weak points.","Intervention weakened or died: Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker.","Intervention weakened or died: Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors."],"watch_next":["Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"what_changed":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`.","Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","The battlefield leader changed from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`."],"what_happened":["This cycle: This cycle centered on Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","Decisive evidence: Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 8.5/100 and Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture...","Audience fit landed strongest with Operator / CISO and weakest with Regulator."],"what_we_learned":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`.","Confidence did not materially de-risk the call, so operator posture should stay bounded.","Intervention posture is reinforcing for 0 thread(s) and weakening for 4.","Audience fit is strongest for Operator / CISO and weakest for Regulator.","Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s)."],"what_we_thought":["Prior call: This cycle centered on Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low."],"confidence_shift":{"summary":"Confidence moved flat: 35.8 -> 33.8; uncertainty 20.0 -> 20.0.","direction":"flat","confidence_delta":-2.0,"uncertainty_delta":0.0,"prior_confidence_score":35.8,"prior_uncertainty_score":20.0,"current_confidence_score":33.8,"current_uncertainty_score":20.0},"battlefield_shift":{"summary":"The battlefield leader changed from `Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities` to `Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks`.","direction":"leader_changed","prior_leader":"Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","current_leader":"Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks"},"what_strengthened":[],"intervention_posture":{"summary":"Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s).","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"strongest_interventions":[],"stalled_intervention_count":4,"traction_intervention_count":0,"falsified_intervention_count":0,"strengthened_intervention_count":0},"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1","retrospective_health_score":82.0},"top_theme_ids":["17f56d37-eb9e-46b6-8588-745dff4c46c4","30298a19-ca98-40b7-995c-9cf27fac0997","392d48f0-fb29-4c28-9d68-932eaac9ea7a","6c527da3-569a-492f-b723-eebaf1401f3b","79e1138f-879f-4d40-8fa8-78429bcd4aa8"],"top_theme_names":["Benchmarking Multi‑Turn Jailbreak Attacks","Real-Time Master Board Control in Soft Robotic Arms","Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities","Legal Frameworks for Cognitive Agency in AI-Driven Armed Conflict","Design and Evaluation Frameworks for Explainable AI Systems"],"promotion_policy":{"governance":{"posture":"challenge_needed","summary":"Promotion governance is challenge_needed: mode balanced, threshold 0.40, concentration risk 0.0/100, usefulness confidence 12.0/100, and Civitas caution low.","warnings":["Promoted-source history is not broadening the source base enough across distinct themes and corroborating lanes.","Confidence in promoted-source usefulness is still thin, so new admission should stay tightly bounded until more assessable outcomes arrive."],"guardrails":["Beachhead-risk and contradiction-first mission shaping stay active.","Per-mind first-pass cap is bounded at 3 source(s) and is inspectable.","Adaptive thresholding is constrained to [0.38, 0.42] — current threshold is 0.400.","Usefulness-confidence gating is inspectable at 12.0/100 and only applies bounded threshold moves."],"recommendations":[],"civitas_informed":true,"challenge_findings":[],"governance_version":"adaptive_governance_v3","civitas_caution_level":"low","civitas_adjudication_count":12,"civitas_challenge_pressure_score":0.0},"adaptive_mode":"balanced","retrospection":{"summary":"Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_died":[],"what_we_learned":["Admission confidence is 12.0/100 because assessable history is 0 source(s).","Pending queue still leans toward `pricing_value`.","Quality posture is weak while concentration posture is controlled."],"what_strengthened":[],"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1"},"adaptive_hooks":{"posture":"fragile","summary":"Adaptive admission is fragile: usefulness confidence 12.0/100, promotion readiness 28.0/100, and mode balanced.","hook_version":"phase8_v1","bounded_actions":["Beachhead-risk and contradiction-first mission shaping stay active.","Per-mind first-pass cap is bounded at 3 source(s) and is inspectable.","Adaptive thresholding is constrained to [0.38, 0.42] — current threshold is 0.400.","Usefulness-confidence gating is inspectable at 12.0/100 and only applies bounded threshold moves."],"loosening_pressures":["Diversity health is still only 0.0/100.","Weak-source rate is controlled at 0%."],"tightening_pressures":["Usefulness-confidence score is only 12.0/100."],"promotion_readiness_score":28.0,"usefulness_confidence_score":12.0},"quality_posture":"weak","promotion_readiness_score":28.0,"usefulness_confidence_score":12.0},"audience_reasoning":{"summary":"Audience reasoning lands hardest with Operator / CISO and Board; Operator / CISO is currently strongest, while Regulator remains the weakest fit. Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","audience_deltas":[{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":46.64,"cares_most":true,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"board","urgency_score":39.57,"audience_label":"Board","maturity_score":12.79,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","relevance_delta":3.95,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":52.14,"confidence_delta":1.6,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":32.54,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":[],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":41.01,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"medium","audience_slug":"ceo_founder","urgency_score":34.0,"audience_label":"CEO / Founder","maturity_score":8.94,"reasoning_basis":"weak","relevance_delta":-1.83,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":46.36,"confidence_delta":0.09,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":31.03,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":["This audience remains mostly declared-targeting language without stronger evidence carry-through."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":46.26,"cares_most":true,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"procurement","urgency_score":40.29,"audience_label":"Procurement","maturity_score":8.87,"reasoning_basis":"declared_audience_only","relevance_delta":2.52,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":50.71,"confidence_delta":-0.83,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":30.11,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":1,"evidence_signal_count":0,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":[],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":36.03,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"very_high","audience_slug":"regulator","urgency_score":35.0,"audience_label":"Regulator","maturity_score":5.16,"reasoning_basis":"weak","relevance_delta":-11.4,"relevance_label":"low","relevance_score":36.79,"confidence_delta":-3.19,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":27.75,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 2 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":48.79,"cares_most":true,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"operator_ciso","urgency_score":40.86,"audience_label":"Operator / CISO","maturity_score":12.51,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","relevance_delta":6.74,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":54.93,"confidence_delta":2.31,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":33.25,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":2,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false}],"early_audiences":["Board","CEO / Founder","Procurement","Regulator","Operator / CISO"],"mature_audiences":[],"weakest_audience":"Regulator","reasoning_version":"phase7_v1","strongest_audience":"Operator / CISO","developing_audiences":[],"most_relevant_audiences":["Operator / CISO","Board"],"highest_urgency_audiences":["Operator / CISO","Procurement"],"learned_intervention_patterns":["Learning posture is drag: 0 confirming outcome(s), 0 falsifying outcome(s), 0 traction signal(s), and governance history 0/0/0 accepted/rejected/revised."],"strongest_interventions_by_audience":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","weakest_interventions":["Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Security Risks from Increasing Protein Manipulation Capabilities into the buyer proof standard"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]}]},"civitas_feedback_learning":{"hold_rate":0.0,"revise_rate":0.0,"caution_level":"low","operator_note":"Recent Civitas outcomes are not materially tightening Orbital readiness thresholds.","publishable_rate":0.0,"adjudication_count":12,"weak_evidence_rate":0.0,"verdict_distribution":{"heartbeat_succeeded":12},"threshold_adjustments":{"minimum_confidence_score":0.0,"maximum_uncertainty_score":0.0,"maximum_contradiction_score":0.0,"minimum_evidence_sufficiency_score":0.0},"challenge_pressure_score":0.0,"challenged_claim_families":[],"recurring_failure_patterns":[],"surviving_recommendation_families":[]},"committee_pipeline_version":"p54_v1","behavioral_pipeline_version":"p53_v1"}}