{"id":"ba9d292d-758c-4234-829b-c58702d2130d","workspace_slug":"orbital","window_days":7,"window_start":"2026-07-08T00:00:00Z","window_end":"2026-07-15T00:00:00Z","generated_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:06.117294Z","verdict_version":"phase8_v1","overall_posture":"watchful","summary":"This cycle centered on Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026), with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","top_priorities":["Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme"],"top_risks":["Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow."],"top_opportunities":["Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Check whether a commercial wedge sits underneath the apparently neutral update."],"recommended_next_actions":["Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Instrument Tighten posture around the governed weak points more directly before using it as a decision signal.","Are there commercial interests behind the Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) narrative?","Who benefits if Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) gains mainstream acceptance?"],"monitor_only_items":["Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026): pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"linked_artifact_count":10,"linked_adjudication_count":1,"linked_proposal_count":0,"confidence_summary":{"confidence_score":56.5,"confidence_band":"medium","ambiguity_score":0.0,"data_sparsity_score":0.0,"novelty_risk_score":100.0,"causal_weakness_score":0.0,"uncertainty_score":20.0,"uncertainty_band":"low","summary":"Confidence is medium at 56.5/100; uncertainty is low at 20.0/100.","reasons":["Confidence is medium because evidence sufficiency is 21.3/100 and corroboration is 67.5/100.","Uncertainty is low because ambiguity/data sparsity combine to 20.0/100."],"factors":[{"name":"evidence_sufficiency","value":21.3,"reason":"Confidence should track how much grounded evidence Orbital actually has."},{"name":"corroboration","value":67.5,"reason":"Independent reinforcement raises confidence."},{"name":"ambiguity","value":0.0,"reason":"Ambiguous or conflicting evidence should raise uncertainty."},{"name":"data_sparsity","value":0.0,"reason":"Thin data should keep confidence bounded."},{"name":"novelty_risk","value":100.0,"reason":"New patterns deserve more caution than recurring ones."},{"name":"causal_weakness","value":0.0,"reason":"Derived or correlative reads should carry extra uncertainty."}]},"audience_reasoning":{"reasoning_version":"phase7_v1","summary":"Audience reasoning lands hardest with Procurement and Operator / CISO; Procurement is currently strongest, while Regulator remains the weakest fit. Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","most_relevant_audiences":["Procurement","Operator / CISO"],"highest_urgency_audiences":["Procurement","Operator / CISO"],"early_audiences":["Board","CEO / Founder","Procurement","Regulator","Operator / CISO"],"mature_audiences":[],"developing_audiences":[],"strongest_audience":"Procurement","weakest_audience":"Regulator","audience_deltas":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","relevance_score":49.36,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":-2.67,"confidence_score":42.64,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":-0.35,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":18.04,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":35.0,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":43.03,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","relevance_score":56.07,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":4.04,"confidence_score":44.63,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":1.64,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":18.32,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":34.29,"proof_burden":"medium","care_score":46.53,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","relevance_score":61.0,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":8.97,"confidence_score":44.06,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":1.07,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":17.56,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":40.86,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":52.26,"cares_most":true,"declared_signal_count":1,"evidence_signal_count":1,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"mixed","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","relevance_score":40.0,"relevance_label":"low","relevance_delta":-12.03,"confidence_score":39.69,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":-3.3,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":8.06,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":36.0,"proof_burden":"very_high","care_score":38.24,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"weak","reasons":[]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","relevance_score":53.71,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_delta":1.68,"confidence_score":43.92,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_delta":0.93,"maturity":"early","maturity_score":17.75,"urgency":"low","urgency_score":40.57,"proof_burden":"high","care_score":47.98,"cares_most":false,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":2,"outcome_signal_count":0,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 2 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."]}],"strongest_interventions_by_audience":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]}],"learned_intervention_patterns":["Learning posture is drag: 0 confirming outcome(s), 0 falsifying outcome(s), 0 traction signal(s), and governance history 0/0/0 accepted/rejected/revised."]},"retrospective":{"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1","summary":"Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`. Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0. Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s). Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_we_thought":["Prior call: This cycle centered on Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low."],"what_happened":["This cycle: This cycle centered on Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026), with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","Decisive evidence: Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 21.3/100 and Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture...","Audience fit landed strongest with Procurement and weakest with Regulator."],"what_changed":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme","The battlefield leader changed from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0."],"what_strengthened":[],"what_died":["Intervention weakened or died: Tighten posture around the governed weak points.","Intervention weakened or died: Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker.","Intervention weakened or died: Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors."],"what_we_learned":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Confidence improved while uncertainty stayed bounded, so the current call has become more believable.","Intervention posture is reinforcing for 0 thread(s) and weakening for 4.","Audience fit is strongest for Procurement and weakest for Regulator.","Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s)."],"watch_next":["Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026): pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"confidence_shift":{"direction":"up","current_confidence_score":56.5,"prior_confidence_score":29.4,"current_uncertainty_score":20.0,"prior_uncertainty_score":24.2,"confidence_delta":27.1,"uncertainty_delta":-4.2,"summary":"Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0."},"battlefield_shift":{"direction":"leader_changed","current_leader":"Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","prior_leader":"Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators","summary":"The battlefield leader changed from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`."},"intervention_posture":{"strengthened_intervention_count":0,"traction_intervention_count":0,"falsified_intervention_count":0,"stalled_intervention_count":4,"strongest_interventions":[],"weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"],"summary":"Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s)."},"retrospective_health_score":86.0},"strongest_evidence_summary":"Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 21.3/100 and Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture..","strongest_contradiction_summary":"This could still be a mixed signal where one visible lane is louder than the market as a whole.","governed_outcome_summary":"Civitas history for this workspace is low caution with revise rate 0% and hold rate 0%.","linked_artifact_refs":[{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"7c6bd6d3-c2d5-4c3b-8b47-d35f51e403d7","title":"Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:05.173865+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":21.3}},{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"92f5fc90-70a0-41fc-8e14-9c4f7b26e40d","title":"Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:05.173865+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":8.5}},{"artifact_kind":"ranked_theme","artifact_type":"theme","artifact_id":"57e8e443-f3f4-467e-bff2-901c0087ca3f","title":"Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme","status":"genuine_market_shift","generated_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:05.173865+00:00","metadata":{"steering_pressure_score":0.0,"market_shaping_confidence_score":18.3}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"message_push","artifact_id":"ab5d1049-311a-420a-b9c4-37437a76e055","title":"Tighten posture around the governed weak points","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:15:08.185888+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Operator memo + leadership narrative","audience":"Executive sponsors and governance reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"pack_deployment","artifact_id":"b46db893-a1ec-4e10-9f84-195639feefae","title":"Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:15:08.185888+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Executive brief + proof pack","audience":"Procurement, legal, and risk reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"narrative_shift","artifact_id":"265d21ff-97b9-44dc-b709-adc762d72806","title":"Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:15:08.185888+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Podcast brief + weekly post sequence","audience":"Executive sponsors and procurement stakeholders"}},{"artifact_kind":"intervention","artifact_type":"message_push","artifact_id":"ca800f50-7fc7-4f4b-9a73-2a727db07054","title":"Tighten posture around the governed weak points","status":"draft","generated_at":"2026-07-12T06:13:14.972076+00:00","metadata":{"channel":"Operator memo + leadership narrative","audience":"Executive sponsors and governance reviewers"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"bcac264f-9732-411f-ba0c-059258d3bf45","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly intervention rehearsal — Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker — 2026-07-14","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:16:00.620801+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"e9fea8e5-bcf3-4e6d-9033-805dc6cdc86a","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly opportunity alignment scaffold — 2026-07-14","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:16:00.488405+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}},{"artifact_kind":"pack","artifact_type":"scenario_pack","artifact_id":"f6860a0a-492c-433e-bc1b-6765ab5f1d53","title":"Scenario Pack — Weekly risk pressure scaffold — 2026-07-14","status":"ready","generated_at":"2026-07-13T06:16:00.276249+00:00","metadata":{"pack_version":"prompt31_v1"}}],"linked_adjudications":[{"id":"ac2ad3d0-f954-4629-a88f-85cef5787ad4","handoff_bundle_id":"0fa7b2ef-dd71-4a5a-9826-3e2d0e1b7506","status":"heartbeat_succeeded","final_verdict":null,"publishable_as_is":false,"scope_status":null,"fallback_status":null,"fallback_reason":null,"manual_review_required":false,"coverage_fraction":null,"scope_within_capability":false,"submitted_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:03.880755Z","completed_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:04.322759Z","created_at":"2026-07-14T06:13:03.882113Z"}],"linked_proposals":[],"details":{"omega_version":"prompt_s4_v1","retrospective":{"summary":"Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`. Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0. Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s). Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_died":["Intervention weakened or died: Tighten posture around the governed weak points.","Intervention weakened or died: Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker.","Intervention weakened or died: Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard.","Coverage is brittle because the source base is still narrow.","The read leans heavily on one or two amplification actors."],"watch_next":["Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026): pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking.","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme: pressure remains low enough for monitor-only tracking."],"what_changed":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme","The battlefield leader changed from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0."],"what_happened":["This cycle: This cycle centered on Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026), with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low.","Decisive evidence: Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) carried the strongest cross-lane signal with market-shaping confidence 21.3/100 and Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026) is spreading through 1 source(s) across 1 lane(s) with a clustered amplification posture...","Audience fit landed strongest with Procurement and weakest with Regulator."],"what_we_learned":["Orbital's prior call broke: the leader moved from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","Confidence improved while uncertainty stayed bounded, so the current call has become more believable.","Intervention posture is reinforcing for 0 thread(s) and weakening for 4.","Audience fit is strongest for Procurement and weakest for Regulator.","Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s)."],"what_we_thought":["Prior call: This cycle centered on Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators, with posture watchful and Civitas caution at low."],"confidence_shift":{"summary":"Confidence moved up: 29.4 -> 56.5; uncertainty 24.2 -> 20.0.","direction":"up","confidence_delta":27.1,"uncertainty_delta":-4.2,"prior_confidence_score":29.4,"prior_uncertainty_score":24.2,"current_confidence_score":56.5,"current_uncertainty_score":20.0},"battlefield_shift":{"summary":"The battlefield leader changed from `Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators` to `Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)`.","direction":"leader_changed","prior_leader":"Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators","current_leader":"Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)"},"what_strengthened":[],"intervention_posture":{"summary":"Intervention learning shows 0 strengthening, 0 traction-bearing, 0 falsified, and 4 stalled intervention thread(s).","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"],"strongest_interventions":[],"stalled_intervention_count":4,"traction_intervention_count":0,"falsified_intervention_count":0,"strengthened_intervention_count":0},"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1","retrospective_health_score":86.0},"top_theme_ids":["7c6bd6d3-c2d5-4c3b-8b47-d35f51e403d7","92f5fc90-70a0-41fc-8e14-9c4f7b26e40d","57e8e443-f3f4-467e-bff2-901c0087ca3f","1732f4fc-8421-4021-966e-08f2550cdb8f","28ae9996-382e-40f8-95c6-0fb5ba42a5b6"],"top_theme_names":["Recent ArXiv Activity in Computers and Society (July 2026)","Pragmatic Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems","Unclear but Fast-Growing AI Theme","Certifiable Adversarial Robustness for Neural Networks","Voluntary GPAI Code of Practice for AI Act Transparency and Safety"],"promotion_policy":{"governance":{"posture":"challenge_needed","summary":"Promotion governance is challenge_needed: mode balanced, threshold 0.40, concentration risk 0.0/100, usefulness confidence 12.0/100, and Civitas caution low.","warnings":["Promoted-source history is not broadening the source base enough across distinct themes and corroborating lanes.","Confidence in promoted-source usefulness is still thin, so new admission should stay tightly bounded until more assessable outcomes arrive."],"guardrails":["Beachhead-risk and contradiction-first mission shaping stay active.","Per-mind first-pass cap is bounded at 3 source(s) and is inspectable.","Adaptive thresholding is constrained to [0.38, 0.42] — current threshold is 0.400.","Usefulness-confidence gating is inspectable at 12.0/100 and only applies bounded threshold moves."],"recommendations":[],"civitas_informed":true,"challenge_findings":[],"governance_version":"adaptive_governance_v3","civitas_caution_level":"low","civitas_adjudication_count":24,"civitas_challenge_pressure_score":0.0},"adaptive_mode":"balanced","retrospection":{"summary":"Promotion retrospect is fragile: useful-source confidence 12.0/100, 0 useful promoted source(s), 0 weak source(s), and 0 narrow reinforcement case(s).","what_died":[],"what_we_learned":["Admission confidence is 12.0/100 because assessable history is 0 source(s).","Pending queue still leans toward `pricing_value`.","Quality posture is weak while concentration posture is controlled."],"what_strengthened":[],"retrospective_version":"phase8_v1"},"adaptive_hooks":{"posture":"fragile","summary":"Adaptive admission is fragile: usefulness confidence 12.0/100, promotion readiness 28.0/100, and mode balanced.","hook_version":"phase8_v1","bounded_actions":["Beachhead-risk and contradiction-first mission shaping stay active.","Per-mind first-pass cap is bounded at 3 source(s) and is inspectable.","Adaptive thresholding is constrained to [0.38, 0.42] — current threshold is 0.400.","Usefulness-confidence gating is inspectable at 12.0/100 and only applies bounded threshold moves."],"loosening_pressures":["Diversity health is still only 0.0/100.","Weak-source rate is controlled at 0%."],"tightening_pressures":["Usefulness-confidence score is only 12.0/100."],"promotion_readiness_score":28.0,"usefulness_confidence_score":12.0},"quality_posture":"weak","promotion_readiness_score":28.0,"usefulness_confidence_score":12.0},"audience_reasoning":{"summary":"Audience reasoning lands hardest with Procurement and Operator / CISO; Procurement is currently strongest, while Regulator remains the weakest fit. Early audience posture remains visible for Board, CEO / Founder.","audience_deltas":[{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":43.03,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"board","urgency_score":35.0,"audience_label":"Board","maturity_score":18.04,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","relevance_delta":-2.67,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":49.36,"confidence_delta":-0.35,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":42.64,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":46.53,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"medium","audience_slug":"ceo_founder","urgency_score":34.29,"audience_label":"CEO / Founder","maturity_score":18.32,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","relevance_delta":4.04,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":56.07,"confidence_delta":1.64,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":44.63,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":1,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 1 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":52.26,"cares_most":true,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"procurement","urgency_score":40.86,"audience_label":"Procurement","maturity_score":17.56,"reasoning_basis":"mixed","relevance_delta":8.97,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":61.0,"confidence_delta":1.07,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":44.06,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":1,"evidence_signal_count":1,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":[],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":38.24,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"very_high","audience_slug":"regulator","urgency_score":36.0,"audience_label":"Regulator","maturity_score":8.06,"reasoning_basis":"weak","relevance_delta":-12.03,"relevance_label":"low","relevance_score":40.0,"confidence_delta":-3.3,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":39.69,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":0,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false},{"reasons":["Aggregated evidence hits: 2 evidence signals and 0 outcome signals."],"urgency":"low","maturity":"early","care_score":47.98,"cares_most":false,"proof_burden":"high","audience_slug":"operator_ciso","urgency_score":40.57,"audience_label":"Operator / CISO","maturity_score":17.75,"reasoning_basis":"light_evidence","relevance_delta":1.68,"relevance_label":"medium","relevance_score":53.71,"confidence_delta":0.93,"confidence_label":"low","confidence_score":43.92,"outcome_signal_count":0,"declared_signal_count":0,"evidence_signal_count":2,"maturity_has_early_signal":true,"maturity_has_mature_signal":false}],"early_audiences":["Board","CEO / Founder","Procurement","Regulator","Operator / CISO"],"mature_audiences":[],"weakest_audience":"Regulator","reasoning_version":"phase7_v1","strongest_audience":"Procurement","developing_audiences":[],"most_relevant_audiences":["Procurement","Operator / CISO"],"highest_urgency_audiences":["Procurement","Operator / CISO"],"learned_intervention_patterns":["Learning posture is drag: 0 confirming outcome(s), 0 falsifying outcome(s), 0 traction signal(s), and governance history 0/0/0 accepted/rejected/revised."],"strongest_interventions_by_audience":[{"audience_slug":"board","audience_label":"Board","weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"ceo_founder","audience_label":"CEO / Founder","weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"procurement","audience_label":"Procurement","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"]},{"audience_slug":"regulator","audience_label":"Regulator","weakest_interventions":["Tighten posture around the governed weak points","Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]},{"audience_slug":"operator_ciso","audience_label":"Operator / CISO","weakest_interventions":["Reframe Scaling AI Safety Audits Without Harming Human Evaluators into the buyer proof standard","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"],"strongest_interventions":["Deploy a proof-pack against the main approval blocker","Tighten posture around the governed weak points"]}]},"civitas_feedback_learning":{"hold_rate":0.0,"revise_rate":0.0,"caution_level":"low","operator_note":"Recent Civitas outcomes are not materially tightening Orbital readiness thresholds.","publishable_rate":0.0,"adjudication_count":24,"weak_evidence_rate":0.0,"verdict_distribution":{"heartbeat_succeeded":24},"threshold_adjustments":{"minimum_confidence_score":0.0,"maximum_uncertainty_score":0.0,"maximum_contradiction_score":0.0,"minimum_evidence_sufficiency_score":0.0},"challenge_pressure_score":0.0,"challenged_claim_families":[],"recurring_failure_patterns":[],"surviving_recommendation_families":[]},"committee_pipeline_version":"p54_v1","behavioral_pipeline_version":"p53_v1"}}